Adam Shatz, contributing editor at the 
London Review of Books, recently published an excellent 
essay ("Writers or Missionaries?") in 
The Nation that, among other things, took on the critique of Orientalism that Edward Said launched in the late '70s, and that continues in full force in academic studies of the Middle East. I first met Edward Said in 1977 and met up with him several times since then, in Austin, Ithaca, Egypt...I've read and absorbed and taught much of his work and and used it extensively in my own. And yet...I find what Shatz has to say about where it has evolved, into a kind of orthodoxy, to be quite salutary and bracing, and needed. (And I'll be teaching parts of Said's 
Covering Islam in class this week.)
And yes, it mentions the kufiya, in the context of Palestine solidarity.
"Writing about the region, never an easy undertaking, is likely to become
 still more difficult.
 I am not sure whether the most influential 
current of oppositional thinking about the Middle East is equipped to 
deal with the changes the region is undergoing. I am referring to the 
critique of Orientalism that Edward Said initiated. This style of 
thinking was formative for me, but I fear that it has congealed into an 
orthodoxy; and, as George Orwell wrote, “orthodoxy, of whatever colour, 
seems to demand a lifeless, imitative style.” That we are now able to 
have a more open conversation about Palestine, that students are 
mobilizing against the occupation, is welcome; but Palestine is not the 
Middle East, and it seems peculiar, if not myopic, to talk about 
Palestine as if it were insulated from the rest of the region. And while
 it is understandable that young American students are particularly 
concerned about their government’s policies in the region, these 
policies do not wholly determine its shape and direction. America’s 
power in the Middle East has weakened, though not in favor of forces 
that most of us would consider progressive. Today, we are witnessing a 
tacit alliance of Israel, the military regime in Egypt and the Gulf 
states—particularly Saudi Arabia—against Iran, with which the United 
States, in conflict with its own regional allies, is seeking 
rapprochement. The latest Israeli offensive in Gaza is a measure of how 
marginal Palestine has become to the agenda of Arab states...
Today, it seems to me, 
Palestinians are for the radical Western left 
what Algerians were for Third World–ists in Vidal-Naquet’s day: 
natural-born resisters, fighting not only Israel but its imperial 
patrons, as much on our behalf as theirs. That is the role assigned to 
them in the revolutionary imagination. 
Like the kaffiyeh worn by anti-globalization protesters, this Palestine is little more than a metaphor. Palestine is still “
the
 question” because it holds up a mirror to us. “Too many people want to 
save Palestine,” one activist said to me. But 
it could just as well be 
said that too many people want to be saved by Palestine...
Enormously liberating when it was developed, 
the critique of Orientalism
 has often resulted in a set of taboos and restrictions that inhibit 
critical thinking. They pre-emptively tell us to stop noticing things 
that are right under our noses, particularly the profound cleavages in 
Middle Eastern societies—struggles over class and sect, the place of 
religion in politics, the relationship between men and women; struggles 
that are only partly related to their confrontation with the West and 
with Israel. Indeed, it is sometimes only in those moments of 
confrontation that these very divided societies achieve a fleeting sense
 of unity. 
The theoretical intricacy of academic anti-Orientalism, its 
hermetic and sophisticated language, sometimes conceals an attempt to 
wish away the region’s dizzying complexity in favor of the old, 
comforting logic of anticolonial struggle. Anti-Orientalism will 
continue to provide a set of critical tools and a moral compass, so long
 as it is understood as a point of departure, not a destination. Like 
all old maps, it has begun to yellow. It no longer quite describes the 
region, the up-ender of all expectations, the destroyer of all 
missionary dreams.